CSK Defense
Miami Associate Trevor Whitlow
Case Summary
This dispute arose from a motor vehicle accident lawsuit in which the plaintiff attempted to add the individual driver and the driver’s mother, who was a co-owner of the vehicle, as defendants after the deadline for filing claims had expired. The original complaint named neither the driver nor co-owner but instead named a different family member. Later, the plaintiff sought to amend the complaint to add the driver and mother as defendants, arguing that the amended complaint should be treated as though it had been filed on the same date as the original complaint.
Defense Strategy
Mr. Whitlow was retained to assist outside counsel in securing the dismissal of the amended complaint. He argued that Florida law does not allow a plaintiff to add entirely new individuals as defendants after the statute of limitations has expired and then rely on the original filing date to keep those claims alive.
Mr. Whitlow also established that a narrow exception permitting plaintiffs to rely on the original filing date is confined to the context of related corporate entities and does not extend to individuals who happen to be members of the same family. As a result, the amended complaint was time-barred under Florida law.
Outcome
The court affirmed the dismissal with prejudice of the claims against both the driver and co-owner, agreeing that the amended complaint could not relate back to the original complaint. As a result, the claims against CSK's clients remained barred because they were brought after the statute of limitations had expired.
Our team is available to discuss the topics written here and ready to provide additional information contained in this article. Contact us for more information.
