CSK Defense
Miami Associate Julia Nelson
Case Summary
A tenant filed two related lawsuits against a property owner and a property management company alleging unlawful eviction, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of a lease agreement. The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendants had falsified a lease agreement and proceeded with an unlawful eviction against her husband despite knowing that she was the rightful tenant.
Ms. Nelson represented the property owner in a proceeding before the Broward County Court and the property management company in a separate case before the Broward County Circuit Court. The Plaintiff pursued claims against both Defendants, while her husband was also named as a Plaintiff in the case against the property management company. The lawsuits involved multiple amended complaints and continued litigation over the legal sufficiency of the claims.
Defense Strategy
Ms. Nelson challenged the Plaintiff's claims through successive stages of litigation, opposing repeated efforts to amend the complaints after multiple opportunities to present legally sufficient allegations. In the Circuit Court proceeding, the defense opposed the Plaintiff's request to file a third amended complaint. In the related County Court proceeding, the team challenged the Plaintiff's request for additional time and permission to file a fourth amended complaint.
The defense maintained its position as both courts considered the extensive procedural histories, prior opportunities to amend, and compliance with court orders.
Outcome
The claims brought by the Plaintiff's husband against the property management company were dismissed with prejudice in March 2026. Subsequently, the Broward County Court denied the Plaintiff's request to file a fourth amended complaint with prejudice, citing more than 700 days of litigation, failure to comply with prior court orders, and a lack of excusable neglect. The Broward County Circuit Court similarly denied the Plaintiff's request to file a third amended complaint with prejudice, finding that she had exhausted her opportunities to present legally sufficient claims.
The rulings brought both lawsuits to a close on the merits and demonstrated the value of sustained defense motion practice in addressing legally insufficient claims and limiting prolonged litigation.
Our team is available to discuss the topics written here and ready to provide additional information contained in this article. Contact us for more information.
