CSK Defense Team
Orlando Partner Scott Shelton
Tampa Partner Marina Moussa
Case Summary
This case stemmed from a rear-end motor vehicle accident involving a commercial freightliner and a passenger vehicle. The Plaintiff alleged that the collision caused neck and back injuries as well as a concussion. Although the Defendant admitted fault for the accident, the central dispute was whether the crash caused the injuries claimed by the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff was evaluated at a hospital on the day of the incident and released. She later pursued chiropractic treatment and underwent MRIs of her neck, back, and brain. While her treating providers characterized the injuries as serious and permanent, the diagnostic imaging revealed no objective findings supporting those conclusions.
Defense Strategy
The CSK Defense Team focused on the critical distinction between admitting fault for an accident and proving injury and causation. Defense experts testified that the diagnostic studies were normal and did not support the alleged injuries.
The defense also highlighted the financial relationships between the Plaintiff’s attorneys, treating providers, and life care planning expert. Testimony revealed deferred payment arrangements that closely resembled letters of protection. By emphasizing these relationships and inconsistencies in the medical evidence, the defense raised credibility concerns and underscored the absence of objective proof linking the claimed damages to the accident.
Outcome
After deliberating for just one hour, the jury found that the Defendant’s negligence was not a legal cause of the Plaintiff’s alleged injuries or damages and returned a complete defense verdict. No damages were awarded, and the jury found no permanent injury.
The verdict reinforces an important principle in personal injury litigation: even when fault for an accident is admitted, a Plaintiff must still prove that the accident caused the claimed injuries and future medical needs. This outcome highlights the effectiveness of a defense strategy grounded in objective medical evidence, credibility analysis, and a clear presentation of causation standards.
Our team is available to discuss the topics written here and ready to provide additional information contained in this article. Contact us for more information.
