CSK Defense Team
Miami Partner Jennifer V. Ruiz
Miami Associate Natalia Trabue
Case Summary
The Plaintiff, a Florida rental company, leased seven (7) condominium units within a South Florida beachfront community thereafter subleasing them to short-term guests. The Defendant Condominium Association enforced its rules regarding occupancy limits and minimum-night stay requirements. The Defendant Property Management Company acted as the Association’s agent in administering and enforcing such rules.
Over several years, the Association repeatedly notified unit owners and tenants, including the Plaintiff, about violations involving excessive occupancy and unauthorized short-term stays. Despite these warnings, the Plaintiff continued to violate the restrictions. As a result, the Association terminated Plaintiff’s right to lease and sub-lease any units within the Association’s community.
The Plaintiff sued the Defendants, asserting 14 counts for tortious interference with business relationships and seeking damages for lost rental income and other related losses.
Defense Strategy
The Defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiff’s claims failed as a matter of law. The CSK Defense Team established that the Association had a clear supervisory and contractual interest in all leases within the condominium community and therefore could not be considered a “stranger” to the Plaintiff’s business relationships, a required element of a tortious interference claim. Also, that any interference with leases as a result of enforcing the Association’s occupancy rules was justified.
The Defendants also demonstrated that the Association acted within its authority under the governing documents and that the Property Management Company merely carried out the Association’s directives as its agent.
In addition, the defense showed that the Plaintiff could not establish causation or damages. The Plaintiff failed to identify specific sub-lease business relationships that were allegedly interfered with and did not present admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to support its claimed financial losses.
Outcome
Following a special-set hearing, the Broward County Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of both Defendants and dismissed the case in its entirety. The court found that the Association acted within its authority to enforce its governing documents, maintained a supervisory interest in the leases, and did not intentionally or unjustifiably interfere with the Plaintiff’s business relationships. The court further determined that the Plaintiff’s damages claims were speculative and unsupported by competent evidence.
As a result, the Plaintiff recovered nothing, and the Defendants were dismissed from the lawsuit. The decision reinforces the authority of condominium associations to enforce governing documents against tenants and sublessors and highlights that tortious interference claims require proof of that the defendant is a stranger to the relationship, not justified in its interference, identifiable business relationships, and actual damages.
Our team is available to discuss the topics written here and ready to provide additional information contained in this article. Contact us for more information.
